분류 | 상법 |
---|
Hello,
We have an Employee Dishonesty claim to make against our insurance company for a fraud case involving our (now former) employees. There are about 15 individuals who committed fraud against us, but the insurance company is grouping up the incidents as one occurrence and only willing to submit payment for only one occurrence. We believe that each case should be treated as own and not grouped together, as the employees were not working together, but worked alone and in different times / locations to obtain personal benefits at the cost of the company. Our insurance company is fighting back on this stating that this is on their policy:
d. All loss or damage:
(1) Caused by one or more persons; or
(2) Involving a single act or series of acts;
is considered one occurrence.
Our question is, how is it even determined whether something is considered one occurrence or not? The language is very unclear and vague and could possibly mean anything can be grouped under one occurrence. We would like to see is there's a possibility of fighting this and winning the case if we were to take legal action and hire a lawyer.
Thank you!
번호 | 분류 | 제목 | 글쓴이 | 조회 수 |
---|---|---|---|---|
572 | 소송 | 이웃집이 우리 property 침범 [1] | findmiroway | 312 |
571 | 소송 | 손님한테 물건을 $2000 어치가량 물건을 팔고 체크로 받앗습니다. [1] | daviddaviddavid | 279 |
570 | 소송 | 층간 소음으로 인한 분쟁 [1] | 쿠파파파 | 1116 |
569 | 소송 | 너무 억울 합니다 도와주세요 [1] | Grace | 352 |
568 | 소송 | 아파트 천장에서 물이 샜을 때 보상 [1] | skylover35 | 548 |
567 | 소송 | 안녕하세요 변호사님.. [1] | wowjungs | 217 |
566 | 소송 | 황당한 자동차 토탈로스 타이틀관련 [1] | famoussnail7 | 828 |
565 | 소송 | 궁금한게 있어서 문의드립니다 변호사님 [1] | Eenymini | 209 |
564 | 소송 | 크레딧 [1] | Heydon | 182 |
563 | 소송 | 이것도 명예훼손죄로 소송할수 있나요 [1] | Janproda | 377 |
562 | 소송 | 민사 소송 [1] | Printer1234 | 324 |
561 | 소송 | 레이저클리닉 소송 [1] | adnsh1004 | 319 |
560 | 소송 | 민사일까요 형사도 가능할까요 [1] | Styles-b | 384 |
559 | 소송 | Out of Court Settlement [1] | hillen | 1213 |
558 | 소송 | 마켓의 부당한 대우 또 당했네요. [1] | Gorewear5 | 230 |
557 | 소송 | 하숙집 주인과 분쟁 [1] | 너랑나랑 | 312 |
556 | 소송 | RETAINER AGREEMENT [1] | Yoonsam | 2022 |
555 | 소송 | 아파트 매니저 [1] | Editor1234 | 672 |
554 | 소송 | 빌려준 돈 못 받을때 어떤 절차가 있는지 문의 드립니다. [1] | whistle | 499 |
553 | 소송 | USPS 우편물 분실 [1] | GMI | 952 |
In responding to your inquiry, please be advised that the attorney must have an opportunity to review the coverage policy to answer to your question. Generally, the coverage policy should define the terms used in the coverage. Yes, I agree with you that many cases the terms and the wordings used are ambiguous. That is why you need to hire an attorney who specializes in reviewing the insurance policy.
You can probably find a qualified attorney through online research. Sorry I am not able to assist you much.
Good luck to you.